Website development

AI website audit

Paste a website URL — the tool checks the homepage, policy page, forms and external services. It is a quick risk profile, not a legal opinion.

Website audit for 152-FZ

We scan policy, cookies, forms, analytics and document publication. The result is 5 scores out of 100, issues and practical recommendations.

All tools
Views3Rating5.07uses1review

Benefits

Finds risks quickly and explains what to fix for 152-FZ

  • 5 scores

    01

    Policy, forms, cookies, analytics, HTTPS and publication are checked separately.

  • No sign-up

    02

    Paste a public URL and run the check directly on the page.

  • Fix list

    03

    Each issue explains the problem, evidence and recommended action.

  • Ready for request

    04

    Send us the report to fix documents, forms and cookie scenarios.

Process

How it works

  1. Load the site

    01

    We open the homepage and several public sections.

  2. Find documents

    02

    We look for policy pages, footer links and consent documents.

  3. Check scenarios

    03

    Forms, checkboxes, cookies, analytics and third-party services are reviewed.

  4. Build report

    04

    AI combines the signals into a risk profile and recommendations.

Why 152-FZ matters

A quick check before forms, ads, analytics and cookies go live

152-FZ applies to most websites that collect names, phones, emails, requests or analytics identifiers. Users should understand what is collected, why, where the policy is published and how cookies are managed.

The tool highlights technical and document risks: policy, footer links, form consent, cookie banner choices and third-party services.

Scope

A baseline risk profile before launch, ads or client handoff

What the tool checks

  • Privacy policy presence and key sections
  • Footer and form-adjacent policy links
  • Request forms, consent checkboxes and submit text
  • Cookie banner, equal choice and analytics cookies
  • Analytics, pixels, chats, CRM and third-party services
  • Document visibility, HTTPS and technical publication risks
  • Recommendations for every risk

Rating

Views3Rating5.07uses1review

Help us understand how useful this checker is. The rating is saved in our database and updates the tool score.

Tools

Other tools

FAQ

Answers to the main questions

Is this a legal opinion?

No. The tool creates a technical public risk profile and does not replace a lawyer.

Why can the score be below 100 if a policy exists?

The check also covers footer links, forms, cookie choices, analytics and publication.

Does AI inspect the whole website?

It checks the homepage, found policy and several relevant public pages, enough for a quick profile.

Can I check a client site?

Yes, if it is public. The tool does not inspect admin panels or private addresses.

Why are free checks limited to 2 per day?

The audit loads the website, several pages and may use the AI layer, so the limit protects the tool from bulk scraping.

Does the tool show fines?

Yes, but only when the risk is confidently tied to a specific administrative offence. Otherwise it stays a warning.

Are Google Analytics and Meta Pixel always forbidden?

Not automatically, but they are high-risk services that require separate review, policy disclosure and cookie consent logic.

Does it check analytics before consent?

The tool detects analytics scripts, cookie banners and equal-choice controls. Missing controls become a risk.

What should I do if the score is below 100?

Open the issue groups: every item explains why it matters, where it was found and what to fix.

Does it check Roskomnadzor notification duties?

The website audit cannot see internal processing flows, so notification duties should be confirmed manually.

Fix the detected risks

Send the site or the audit result. We’ll explain what can be fixed quickly and where legal review or site logic updates are better.

Leave your contacts — we’ll review the report and fix documents, cookies, forms and analytics. No unnecessary services.